Monday, October 25, 2010

BFF 4 Eva!

It’s Female Friendship Week over at The Frisky.  What, you ask yourself, is Female Friendship Week all about?  Let’s take a look:


Besties, frenemies, sisters, and groups of gal pals.  Explore the joy, the sorrow, and the everything else of the female friendships in our lives.  Let’s face it, dudes are much less complicated creatures.  But they could never replace the ladies in our lives (The Frisky).


Ah, I love it when modern connections to the female homosocial and lesbian continuum found within MMMB drop into my lap without any effort on my behalf.  
Speaking of (literary) sisters, I’m going to take the opportunity to share an xkcd comic about Emily Dickinson, a Jane Austen PostSecret card, and the article “Jane Austen’s Well-Known Style Owed Much to Her Editor, Scholar Argues” from The Chronicle of Higher Education by Jennifer Howard.


From xkcd:
[click for larger image]


[click for larger image]


From The Chronicle of Higher Education: “Jane Austen’s Well-Known Style Owed Much to Her Editor, Scholar Argues” by Jennifer Howard


Also, Jane Austen’s Fiction Manuscripts?  Amazing.  Simply amazing.  What a beautiful and stunning example of digital humanities.  Now anyone with a computer, not just scholars with access to expensive databases and journals, can see Austen’s manuscripts, over 1,100 pages worth.  The site also allows you to view, side by side, published editions and Austen’s handwritten manuscripts.  And unlike the (Emily) Dickinson Electronic Archives, there aren’t entire sections subject to restricted access.


Enjoy.  


Works Cited:

Anonymous.  Jane Austen Is Better Than Sex.  Digital image.  PostSecret (Tumblr Archive). 16 June 2010.  Web.  25 Oct. 2010.  <http://postsecret.tumblr.com/post/704140943>.

Munroe, Randall.  The Carriage.  Digital image.  xkcd.  03 Sept. 2010.  Web.  25 Oct. 2010. <http://xkcd.com/788/>.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Paper Proposal

The assignment from Dr. Logan:


Call for Papers!  LIT 6216:  Unruly Women in Early American Literature.

The organizers of the LIT 6216 Scholars Group announce a call for papers to be presented at its final graduate student conference on Tuesday, December 7, 2010 from 7-9:50 p.m.  The conference will explore representations of women as transgressive or unruly; “unruly” is understood in a broad sense in the context of early American gender norms.  Topics might include women whose experiences were out of the ordinary (captivity, travel, etc.), women who broke laws or defied dominant cultural mores and/or values, cross-dressing women, etc.  Exploration of different textual forms  is welcome, including sentimental or historical novels, speeches, conversion narratives, crime and execution narratives,  short fiction, autobiography (including diaries memoirs, journals), biography, letters, poetry, etc.  Papers should engage with the scholarly conversation in early American literary studies, including a knowledge of the historical and cultural context in which the text was produced.   Please send questions and/or submit your abstract to Dr. Lisa M. Logan by 10/22/10.

Conference format:  Papers for this conference will be circulated beforehand and discussed (rather than read) at the conference meeting. 

See Research Project Components for more details.


[Submitted 24 October 2010]

Jay Jay Stroup

Graduate Student, UCF
jayjaystroup@knights.ucf.edu


Bonds of Intimacy: 
Locating the Female Homosocial & Lesbian Continuum in Milcah Martha Moore’s Book

The modern critical edition of Milcah Martha Moore’s Book, published in 1997, exposes previously ignored women’s writing in early American literature.  Moore’s commonplace book, an unpublished, non-traditional format, is now accessible to all scholars.  While Catherine Blecki and Karin Wulf provide invaluable scholarship regarding the culture of the Philadelphia, as well as manuscript and print culture during the Revolutionary era, there is no mention of Queer or Feminist theory.  The possibility of locating the female homosocial and lesbian continuum in MMMB is hinted at through Blecki’s and Wulf’s multiple references to female friendship, but not made explicit.  It is my intent to strengthen these references through the use of Queer and Feminist theories, and explore the physical object of Moore’s commonplace book as a site of the female homosocial and lesbian continuum in early American literature.     

Moore’s commonplace book simultaneously preserves the work of Susanna Wright, Hannah Griffitts, and Elizabeth Graeme Fergusson and establishes a female homosocial presence through the dominance of female authorship within the text.  Out of the one hundred and twenty six entries, sixty three of them are authored by Griffitts (exactly fifty percent of the entries), twenty five are authored by Wright, and three by Graeme Fergusson.  Though other themes are represented, the text opens with “An Essay on Friendship” by Griffitts, thereby signaling the tone and theme of the work as a whole.  Through the use of Susan Stabile’s scholarship on the relationship between memory and the archive, and commonplacing as a distinctly feminized art I argue that not only does the text operate on the lesbian continuum, it also transgresses normative female behavior for colonial America in terms of reading and authorship.  I am relying on the scholarship of Kevin J. Hayes (A Colonial Woman’s Bookshelf) to provide evidence of normative and transgressive reading experiences of women during colonial America.   

Adrienne Rich’s "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence" highlights the way in which behavior not ascribing to strict hetero-normative standards is punished, the concept of which is transferable to MMMB: Griffitts and Wright refuse to marry, Moore is thrown out of the Society of Friends for marriage to a cousin, and Graeme Fergusson’s secret marriage to a Tory ruins her economically, socially, and politically.  While Carroll Smith-Rosenberg’s "The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth-Century America" deals with literature and behavior of the 1800s, there are markers of the female homosocial and lesbian continuum that are also applicable to MMMB, specifically in the entries dealing with female friendship.  

By focusing the lens of Queer theory on a commonplace book from early American literature, strategies of defiance and non-compliance by women in regards to their sexuality, readership and authorship are brought to light.  It is the strategies of defiance contained within that classify MMMB as an unruly text, authored and edited by unruly women.  Re-identifying the commonplace book as a site of the female homosocial expands, rather than contracts, the possibilities for future scholarship.  This identification invites and encourages the co-mingling of other schools of theory – feminist, racial, cultural, historical, economical and more.  

Friday, October 22, 2010

Inside Joke

“It’s a POLITICAL text!” – Dr. Logan


[click for larger image]

Thank you to Elizabeth, Stephen’s wife, and Elizabeth’s sister, for making such a delicious cake for our class.  And no, you can never have too much frosting!

You can read about The Coquette; or, the History of Eliza Wharton by Hannah Webster Foster on Wikipedia, and download the text for free on Project Gutenberg.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

The Future of the Book

Sometime in either middle school or high school, I discovered Anne Rice’s Interview with a Vampire, which was originally published in 1976.  I devoured it, and quickly became obsessed with the rest of the books in the Vampire Chronicles series.  I also read and loved the Mayfair Witches series.  Anyways, I follow Anne Rice on Facebook, and she loves to interact with her fans, encouraging them to comment on her fan page.   


Below is a series of questions posed by Anne Rice on her Facebook page this past Monday (October 18th).  I’m reposting them because she asks about the future of the book as a physical object, which prompted me to think how I would redesign the book.  You don’t have to have a Facebook account to see her fan page, so I’ll leave it up to you to find out what her fans had to say in response to these questions.  You can also visit her official website for her Facebook and Twitter feeds.


[Monday, October 18, 2010 @ 1:29 pm]
Nancy Bento supplied us with this link to a story about the possible disappearance of the physical book. I don't think the physical book WILL disappear, frankly, but what are your thoughts?


Link: Will physical books be gone in five years?
As e-book readers and tablet computers become more common, one prominent tech mogul says that physical books could disappear sooner than expected.


[Monday, October 18, 2010 @ 1:31 pm]
You've probably heard me float this idea before: the physical book can be saved by a new kind of physical book: a synthetic book that weighs less, lasts longer, and costs infinitely less to produce. Why aren't we seeing innovations in the physical book?


[Monday, October 18, 2010 @ 1:39 pm]
Why do books have to look like they did in the 1500's? Why are they still made of paper? Imagine a beautiful synthetic book, feather weight, with bright white pages, impervious to mildew, water, or rot. Why not? Why is there no investment in this area?


[Monday, October 18, 2010 @ 1:41 pm]
A new synthetic book could preserve the age old fonts, the glory of full color illustrations, the beautiful feel of the volume in hand, yet be cheap to produce, cheap to ship, and easy to store. To save the book, we need to remake the book. We have reinvented clothing with synthetics. Why not books?


[Monday, October 18, 2010 @ 1:57 pm]
Kindle and ebooks are fine for those who are connected, and possess technology. But a new featherweight synthetic physical book could go with one to the most remote villages or mountain peaks or desert islands of the world. It could endure in a tropical rain forest. Shipping and storage of such books could revolutionize the "book industry."

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Whip Our Hair and Just Shake Them Off

Can a nine year old girl be cooler than a twenty-nine year old woman? If that nine year old girl is Willow Smith, then the answer is a “hell yes.” The release of Willow Smith’s video for “Whip My Hair” debuted Monday, October 18th. I am fascinated with both the video and the fan-created videos inspired by the music and choreography (which appeared on YouTube before the actual video). A friend posted a link to a YouTube video of the choreography rehearsal on Facebook, and the song immediately stuck in my head.


Then I found the video created by girls who look to be around the same age as Willow (9-12 years old?), in which they dance in a playground and in front of a building, mimicking the choreography. It’s awesome. And by the way, there are no longer any excuses for adult graduate students and professors not to engage in digital technology – because if these preteen girls can organize, film, and upload their product to YouTube, then so can adults in the academic world.


I also found the official preview released by Willow’s label for the song, which features still images of Willow with the song playing in the background. It was actually this video which inspired me to write this post. But first, you need to watch the videos.


Official Preview of "Whip My Hair"



Official video for "Whip My Hair"



Fan-created "Whip My Hair" video




Friday, October 15, 2010

Abstract

The assignment from Dr. Logan:  

An abstract is a summary of a scholarly work.  Your abstract will be followed by analysis, linking the scholar’s argument to your proposed project.  Please attach a PDF* of your chosen text to the email when you hand it in.

*I’ve embedded the GoogleBooks preview of Stabile’s book here.


[Submitted 15 October 2010]

Stabile, Susan M.  "Introduction: The Genealogy of Memory."  Memory's Daughters: The Material Culture of Remembrance in Eighteenth-Century America.  NY: Cornell UP, 2004.  1-16. Print.

Stabile’s introduction opens with “glossing over historical realities,” citing the destruction of Deborah Logan’s house to make way for the Second Bank of the United States as an example.  This example illuminates the tension between domestic and public memory existing in early American national history.  Women approach national memory building via genealogical associations grounded in the family and the home.  Stabile defines these associations as “the local, the particular, the domestic” (4).  Women’s aim, unlike men’s, is to accurately recreate the historical record, without the intent to invoke the past and fashion the future (4).  Logan is known by her peers as “a celebrated keeper of cultural memory,” prized for her “careful transcription, preservation, and publication of historical manuscripts” (4)*1.  Stabile explores the etymology of archive, introducing its dual function: “both a physical place and a metaphor for memory” (8).  The thesis of the book is clear, to return the archive to its “properly domestic origins,” allowing the house to become “a site of memory, history and knowledge” (9).  In addition, this relocation exposes the preservation, rather than petrifying, of cultural memory, placing women in the center of early American history, rescuing them from exile on the outskirts (9).  Included are brief biographies of Susanna Wright, Hannah Griffitts, Elizabeth Graeme Fergusson and Annis Boudinot Stockton, plus their intertwining webs of kinship and friendship.  Stabile refers to women’s use and adaptation of the commonplace book genre, stating “the commonplace book recuperates the house, and the female mind, as locales of knowledge and memory” (10).  The commonplace book is simultaneously a physical object representing rhetorical topi and a text, embodying “the very stuff of memory making” (15).  The women of early American history characterize “commonplacing and other domestic arts” as a distinctly feminine art, demonstrating a subversive strategy to reunite women, memory, and knowledge.

By relocating the archive, and thereby the house, to their “proper domestic origins,” Stabile opens the floodgates of analysis for a feminist perspective of the role of memory and archiving in early American history/literature.  She validates and attaches value to the art of commonplacing and other domestic arts which our patriarchal-biased history stripped away over the course of time.  By including unpublished texts and domestic artifacts, Stabile forcibly expands the canon of early American women’s literature.  Her approach is interdisciplinary: architectural theory plays a large role in the book, and sources include historic house museums, societies dedicated to historic preservation, and experts on “early American textiles, metals, and furniture” (xi).  Questions that Stabile’s introduction provoked: in what way does MMMB challenge the creation of a “national memory”?*2  How does Stabile’s concept of archive complicate and/or compliment the genre of commonplace books?  Is MMMB subversive?  Does Moore appear in the later chapters and did she know Deborah Logan?


Footnotes:
1.  This description is almost identical to the ones used to describe Milcah Martha Moore in MMMB.
2.  Stabile describes national memory: “The construction of a ‘national memory’ demands consensus, imposing a ‘duty to remember’ in a kind of fixed and reverential relationship to the past.  At the same time, it requires material reminders for future veneration” (3).

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Does Cathy Davidson Have Groupies?

Because if she does, I want to be one too.  A couple weeks ago, I created a free account on HASTAC, and I follow HASTAC on Twitter as well, so this afternoon, I came across a link for Davidson’s proposed MA in Knowledge and Networks (MAKN).  It’s so freaking cool, you must go read about it right now.




Keep in mind this is an initial draft, and Davidson is asking that you leave comments concerning the proposal.  You can also download the proposal as a PDF.


From the proposal:


We believe that knowledge in the Information Age is not a one-way transmission from expert to learner but is constantly interactive and never stops. We believe that knowledge in the classroom must extend beyond those walls and must bring the knowledge in communities back into the academy as well. We believe that deep knowledge of historical processes, in-depth understanding of context and culture, and sustained critical thinking need to be combined with real-world project management, collaboration, and sophisticated technology and social media skills in order to prepare students for the challenges of a changing world and a twenty-first century workplace (Davidson).


You have no idea how this makes my literary/technophile hybrid-heart go pitter patter, and want to leap out of my chest in excitement.  Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to go geek out over this amazing and revolutionary proposal.


Works Cited:

Davidson, Cathy N. Proposed Master's in Knowledge and Networks.  HASTAC.  HASTAC @ Duke University, 1 Oct. 2010.  Web.  14 Oct. 2010.  <http://hastacblogs.org/duke/makn/ma-in-knowledge-and-networks/>.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Re-Imagination and Disney Princesses

[This post is dedicated to my sister Erin, the most Disney Princess girl I’ve ever known. She’s all about Belle.]


Dr. Logan structured our course so that each of the ten students presents a text to the rest of the class in a 30-45 minute presentation; we are also responsible for the creation of a handout to guide and focus our discussion of the selected text.  Last night’s class was on The Female American, attributed to Unca Eliza Winkfield.  Spencer was our presenter, and on the handout, he included an art deco image of Pocahontas.  In The Female American, Unca Eliza’s Native American mother is a Pocahontas figure, saving her future husband from death at the hands of her tribe, of which her father is king.  Unca Eliza, a bi-racial character, frequently references her skill with a bow and arrow, which makes the selected image particularly suitable.


 [click for a larger view]


Part of our assignment included browsing through the images in Edward J. Gallagher’s Pocahontas Images gallery to acquaint ourselves with the ways in which the persona and image of Pocahontas has been appropriated by cultures throughout time.  There is an astounding amount of images available on the site, and apparently, Pocahontas can, with the stroke of an artist’s paintbrush or pen, transform from a Native American woman into a hybrid into a white woman.


So, during our class discussion (or was it last week’s discussion?  Oh old age, you are wrecking havoc on my memory), the subject of the Disney princesses came up, and Dr. Logan asked us, “Do any of them end their story not married?”  As we sat there thinking, we realized – no, all of the princesses, except Pocahontas, end up married.  However, even Pocahontas cannot escape the fate of a Disney tale, and ends up married in the sequel, Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World (thanks to Jen for saving the day with this trivia tidbit).  


The Homosocial Network

If, as Dr. Logan’s Early American Women’s Words undergraduate class postulates, Facebook is a modern version of the commonplace book, then the movie The Social Network is worth taking a closer look.  I have not seen the movie, and have very little desire to do so, but after reading through some of these movie reviews, I might have to see it – in the name of research, of course.


The first review that caught my eye was on Slate (I am addicted to Dear Prudence).  I glanced through it and a reference to another article, “The (Homo)Social Network” is what snagged my attention.  The homosocial is on my mind almost twenty four seven thanks to this project, so there was no way I could let this opportunity for a modern connection slide past me.


So, I gathered a list of articles reviewing The Social Network, which wasn’t too hard because some of the reviews refer to other reviews.  This list is by no means exhaustive, obviously, but it heartens me to see reviewers grappling with the role of women within the movie, and its social consequences.  Enjoy.


Monday, October 11, 2010

Give Me All Your Lovin’

This postcard was sent to PostSecret, and posted on the site October 3, 2010 (I think, I’m pretty sure it was last week).  (An unofficial archive of the submitted secrets is hosted on Tumblr here).  As soon as I saw it, it reminded me of Adrienne Rich’s concept of compulsory heterosexuality.  And since today is National Coming Out Day, I thought it would be appropriate material for a blog post.  I have to wonder, are there lesbian and homosexual versions of Cosmopolitan magazine?  I honestly don’t know.



[click for a larger image]
On a slightly related note, check out this short film by Don Hertzfeldt of Bitter Films, titled “Ah, L’Amour.”






Crazy, right?  This film is begging to be examined through the lens of the female grotesque.  The women literally turn into absurd, caricaturized monsters that violently kill, dismember, stab, rip off skin, set on fire, and eat the man.  Their replies are composed of stereotypical feminist / male-hating rhetoric: “stop smothering me,” “I need my space,” “I just want to be friends,” “—“ (no verbal response, just a gunshot, and “no means no, you bastard.”  The fat woman is passed over and ignored, because she is fat, ugly and therefore not sexually appealing.  The last woman, upon hearing that the man has money, simply replies with “I love you!” insinuating that women are motivated by money, which implies prostitution.


That being said, I laughed my ass off the first time I saw this cartoon, probably at the Enzian’s Florida Film Festival back in high school.  They used to present Spike & Mike's Sick and Twisted Animation Festival at midnight showings.  Anyways, as I watched “Ah, L’Amour” before putting it on this page, I laughed again.  Does it make me a bad feminist that I laughed?  I personally don’t think so.  I just think of this cartoon as another text to be explored, examined, and cataloged.  For those not familiar with Hertzfeldt’s work, check out his other films on YouTube and provide yourself with some context - "Rejected" and "Billy's Balloon" are my favorites.  No subject matter is safe from ridicule and absurdity, and they’re all hysterically funny.  At least, in my opinion. 

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Lazy Sunday

On this lazy Sunday afternoon, I present another pretty word cloud, made possible by Worlde.  I find these word clouds fascinating, and I wanted to see how Hannah Griffitt’s poem, “An Essay on Friendship,” would rearrange itself.  The poem is available on this post, Happy Happy, Joy Joy.  The more frequent the word in the chosen text, the more prominent it will appear in the word cloud.  I wanted to see how often friend and friendship would appear, and what other words, such as soul or dear or hearts, would be large or small.  Check out the results for yourself.


 
[click for a larger image]


This is the word cloud that appeared with the maximum set to 175 words, which is far less than the 1,260 words included in the poem.  The program allows you to set the word maximum, and when I chose 200, the words in the cloud were too small and crowded.  I set the program to erase out common English words (think the, and, of).  


Do me a favor - keep in mind this is not exactly scientific and we’ll be all right.  The biggest word is, unsurprisingly, friend, followed by friendship and love, soul, joys, joy, and ever.  Ev’ry, dear, care, feel, nature, mind, find, grief, tender, known, sweet, and friend share the same font size.  I’ll let you linger over the word cloud to figure out the next set of words connected by font size.  If one were to conduct an analysis of “An Essay on Friendship” based solely on this word cloud, the themes of friendship, love, a connection between souls, tenderness, and grief are still visible and viable.     


I think it would be interesting to give this word cloud to students and ask them to create a poem, or short story, based on the words within (and using the words within).  If I had time, I would try it, but for now, the idea is shelved.  


Now, I’m off to continue my reading of Susan Stabile’s Memory’s Daughters.  Enjoy your Sunday!   

Friday, October 8, 2010

I Want To Go To There

Last night, I stumbled across the article “Lit-snobs, hot librarians, and the rise of the literary tattoo” by Eugenia Williamson because I follow @AdviceToWriters on Twitter.  The article talks about a forthcoming book titled The Word Made Flesh: Literary Tattoos from Bookworms Worldwide (available through many retailers).  It’s a book with pictures of people who have literary-themed tattoos.  A brief quote from the article:


With any luck, the book will be used as a primary source by anthropologists of the future who have set out to understand what happened to bibliophiles when physical books began to disappear. At the very least, they'll learn that literary passions ran broadly, and deep, and weren't readily digitized. (Williamson)


You can look at some of the tattoos on The Boston Phoenix website here, but the pictures are cropped weirdly and often cut off the tattoo.  Instead, you should go straight to the source and check out lovely Tattoo Lit site.  I spent half an hour last night pouring over the pictures, ooohing and awwwing, and plotting my next tattoo.  Reading the accompanying information sent in with the actual pictures is fascinating – these people really love both literature and tattoos.  They are passionate about both.  


I too love literature and tattoos, and I have five tattoos, although only one of them is literary themed.  Wanna see it?  I’ve wanted this tattoo design ever since I was a little girl, and finally had it inked in April of 2009 by Sideshow Jen at Devotion Tattoos in Orlando, which has since closed.




It’s a bookworm, just like me.  I had Jen base the design off Richard Scarry’s Lowly Worm character.  I caught the reading bug at a very young age, and luckily both my parents and schools encouraged voracious reading.  I don’t really remember this because it happened in elementary school, but apparently my parents bought me the first book in the Little House on the Prairie series by Laura Ingalls Wilder, Little House in the Big Woods.  They told me if I read the whole thing and liked it, they would buy me the rest of the books.  Well, in what they deemed to be too short a time period for me to have the entire book, I finished reading it and demanded the next.  They thought I was a liar.  I must have convinced them that I had indeed read the entire book, because I still have my boxed set of Little House on the Prairie books.  The point being, I was, and am still, a very quick reader of pleasure books.  I used to “steal” my dad’s books and return them to him within a day, finished, while he was still on the second or third chapter.  And I am incredibly lucky in that my request for books was never refused by either one of my parents, even if they were “ridiculous” books by authors like Christopher Pike and R.L. Stine (which I still own!).   


So, do you have any literary tattoos?  Do you want to get one?  If you did, what would it be?

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Talk Nerdy To Me

I enjoy reading literary theory, but sometimes, the jargon is just too much.  If it takes me ten minutes to read a few sentences because I have to “unpack” (a Dr. Anna Jones term) every other word, I one, get annoyed and two, become extremely frustrated.  That being said, I love the terminology of literary theory.  I get a thrill out of hearing these words spoken, or just reading them on the page.  Sometimes, when I hear the same term repeated over and over again, or I write it over and over again, it doesn’t even seem like a real word.  This happened the other day with book, it was very surreal.  Here are a few of my favorites, in no particular order.  (Please note: not all the terms are strictly literary theory terms, but since this is my blog, I can do whatever I want).


[click for a larger image]


Do you ever picture the authors of these terms saying the word?  Or maybe someone you like?  Can you see their lips forming the word, hear their voice tripping or gliding over the constants and vowels?  Does it make you giddy?  Do you get goose bumps or the shivers?  Do you get the giggles?  Does it thrill you?  Does it make you blush?  Am I weird for suggesting such bodily responses?  Probably, but hearing these words, in certain circumstances, cause me to react in unexpected ways.  And I’m betting I’m not the only one.


And if you think my fascination with jargon is limited to literary theory terms only, you’re sadly mistaken.  I recently re-read Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time series and it is filled with an abundance of military jargon, which I fell in love with.  The scenes with Mat Cauthon were my favorite because he’s the general of the Red Hand (Shen an Calhar).  Not only that, he has the memories of hundreds of men stuffed into his head, all of whom were involved in the military, so his vocabulary is quite expansive.  I also recently re-watched Ronald D. Moore’s Battlestar Galatica, and my love affair with military jargon was rekindled: KAG, bring in the cat, Viper jocks, Raptors, Cylon Raiders, mutiny, insurrection, civvies, FTL (faster than light), ambush, and action stations, action stations, this is not a drill, set condition one throughout the ship.     


What are some of your favorite jargon terms, literary or other?


[Word cloud created on the Wordle site.]

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Say It Isn’t So

My math teacher from high school, Mrs. Deborah Costello, posted a link to the article “National Poetry Day: unlock the mathematical secrets of verse” on Facebook and stated, “Mathematicians and poets... its all good! :).”  Let me state for the record: I suck at math.  Sometimes you’ll find me using my fingers to count or frantically searching for a calculator to do what others think of as simple adding and/or subtracting.  So when I saw this article, I was intrigued – what is math doing messing around with poetry?


Here are two short excerpts from the article, which is available here.


Overblown as Erasmus Darwin's verses might seem nowadays, the point of poetry was pattern; to use a strict structure of rhythm and rhyme as a framework for words of passion or pedantry that would become fixed in a reader's brain. Robert Frost put it neatly when he wrote that "Poetry without rules is like tennis without a net".
Poetry, in other words, is mathematics. It is close to a particular branch of the subject known as combinatorics, the study of permutations – of how one can arrange particular groups of objects, numbers or letters according to stated laws (Jones).


I’m not quite sure that I completely agree that poetry is mathematics because it seems to leave out all the passion and creativity that is involved in the creation of said poetry.  And please note, I’m not excluding passion and creativity from mathematics, because I have plenty of friends who are passionate about math in the same manner that I am passionate about literature.  That being said, I did always enjoy writing poetry that was confined to strict patterns because it was like a puzzle; I knew I was on track when all the pieces (aka the words) of said puzzle fell into place.  In some ways, it was more freeing to write within a confined pattern, if that makes any sense.  Anyways, I hope you enjoy the article and Happy (Early) National Poetry Day!


Works Cited:

Jones, Steve. "National Poetry Day: Unlock the Mathematical Secrets of Verse." Telegraph. 5 Oct. 2010. Web. 5 Oct. 2010. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/steve-jones/8043205/National-Poetry-Day-unlock-the-mathematical-secrets-of-verse.html>.