The Plan

Like the Cylons, I too have a plan.  But mine involves a lot less genocide.  And by a lot less, I mean none.  It’s currently 3:30 am, let’s move on so I can get some sleep, shall we?


Rough Draft Fixes*:


*These are fixes I came up with before our manuscript circle on November 30, 2010, when I realized my rough draft was rougher than I would have liked.  Combined with the constructive criticism I received from Zach and Blake, I think I’ll be in good shape to fix my paper for Tuesday, December 7, 2010.

• Susan Stabile relocates and categorizes the 18th century American commonplace book by women as a distinctly feminized genre.  Moore is participating in a subversive tactic of adaptation for feminine purposes – genealogical motivation (reword?) fits in with the preservation of Wrights, Griffitts, and Graeme Ferugsson’s works.  Find quote from Blecki/Wulf that she’s preserving the kinship and friendship networks of Quaker Philadelphia, and use the bonds of intimacy quote too.

• Ivy Schweitzer provides the context of the 18th century American view of classical friendship.  She claims too often critics/scholars equate homosocial with homosexuality – this is why I want to use the lesbian continuum, allows for a broad spectrum without strict binary of hetero/homosexual.

• Kevin J. Hayes provides the context of gender norms and standards of colonial woman’s reading habits, as well as exceptions to these rules.  Most notable is how many women flat out went against convention – more than I expected.

• Eve Sedgwick defines homosocial and female homosocial.  Adrienne Rich defines compulsory heterosexuality and the lesbian continuum.  I disagree that the lesbian continuum and female homosocial must be defined against heterosexuality.

• Evidence from MMMB: biographical, and textual.  The entries provide: language of intimacy (spiritual and sometimes physical closeness – the garden), language of friendship.  Female authorship dominates MMMB – Griffitts provides 50% of the entries and “An Essay on Friendship” opens the text, despite interrupting the well-ordered sections (Wright’s poems follow the first entry).

• Do I use Carroll Smith-Rosenberg’s essay or no?  Do I see female rituals – do the memorial poetry/prose entries count as a female ritual?

• Rework thesis – I don’t think it’s very clear.  Use above summaries to keep my goal front and center: bonds of intimacy = female homosocial -> lesbian continuum.  More clearly articulated: a female homosocial space is carved out by 1. genre (Stabile) and 2. language of intimacy in the entries (by women, for women).  Use of lesbian continuum leaves open the possibility of homosexuality without demanding it.

• Look up MLA rules for: poetry in-text citation and for block quotes (both prose and poetry).

• Flesh out conclusion (do after rest of paper is fixed).

• Update Works Cited to reflect only cited sources.  Erase out placeholders from rough draft (note: Smith-Rosenberg, Schweitzer, Rich were listed in the rough draft as reminders to myself to pull quotes for use in the final draft).

Manuscript Evaluation Form

The assignment from Dr. Logan:


Dear LIT 6216 Scholars,

Thank you for agreeing to serve as manuscript reviewers for the upcoming conference “Early American Novel and the Nation.”  I attach a Reviewer Response Form, which I ask that you use as you review the manuscripts.  I request that you review at least two manuscripts.  In past conferences, writers have praised this conference for the detailed reviewers’ comments that have assisted them with their research and composing processes.  Please complete your reading of the manuscripts and return the sheets to the individual writers by 11/30/10.

Please fill out one Reviewer Response Form for at least two people, and make sure to post your own essay at the common area in discussions (under “Research Proposals and Drafts”).  (As well, please post these at your blogs.)  I am grateful for the spirit of intellectual community which pervades our classroom, and I hope that you will approach this process in that spirit.  


Best, Lisa Logan

LIT 6216:  Unruly Women in Early American Literature

Reviewer Evaluation Form

Call for Papers!  LIT 6216:  Unruly Women in Early American Literature.

The organizers of the LIT 6216 Scholars Group announce a call for papers to be presented at its final graduate student conference on Tuesday, December 7, 2010 from 7-9:50 p.m.  The conference will explore representations of women as transgressive or unruly; “unruly” is understood in a broad sense in the context of early American gender norms.  Topics might include women whose experiences were out of the ordinary (captivity, travel, etc.), women who broke laws or defied dominant cultural mores and/or values, cross-dressing women, etc.  Exploration of different textual forms  is welcome, including sentimental or historical novels, speeches, conversion narratives, crime and execution narratives,  short fiction, autobiography (including diaries memoirs, journals), biography, letters, poetry, etc.  Papers should engage with the scholarly conversation in early American literary studies, including a knowledge of the historical and cultural context in which the text was produced.   Please send questions and/or submit your abstract to Dr. Lisa M. Logan by 10/22/10 via email.

Conference format:  Papers for this conference will be circulated beforehand and discussed (rather than read) at the conference meeting.  Papers should be 8-10 pp. double-spaced using 12-pt. font.  (excluding bibliography/Works Cited). 

[Submitted 30 November 2010]


Instead of filling out the manuscript evaluation form via email, the class as a whole agreed to bring hard copies to our class on November 30, 2010 and read each other’s papers in person.  We were each responsible for reading two people’s papers – ideally someone with whom we shared a panel presentation, and the other selection was up to us.  It was optional whether or not as a reader you filled out the manuscript evaluation form or simply wrote your notes on the hard copy.


I read and evaluated the rough drafts by Blake, Lindsay, and Zach ahead of time so I wouldn’t have to deal with my own project.  In other words, I happily engaged in strategies of procrastination.  In class, I read Stephen’s paper, and I took home Jen’s paper and returned it to her on Thursday (the 2nd).  I greatly enjoyed reading the papers that I had time for, and I’m looking forward to everyone’s presentation during our mock conference.


My readers were Zach and Blake and I want to thank them for their thoughtful and helpful comments and constructive criticism.  An outside perspective is extremely helpful, especially when I’ve been involved with my text for such a long period of time that I forgot not everyone would know what a commonplace book *is* (Blake caught that issue).


I’m including the template of the manuscript evaluation form below, and then I’ll retype the notes from Zach and Blake.  (Blake’s notes are briefer because we ran out of time during class.)


My rough draft is here.

Tweet, Tweet

The following articles came from my Twitter feed, and are posted in no particular order.

• From Cat in the Stack: “Learn Intellectual Property By Doing It” by Cathy Davidson

• “That's a fabulous learning experience by any estimation, but the HASTAC way is to not just create new technologies but to think critically about those technologies, what they mean, how they apply to society or to individual rights and aspirations.   It is also important to transform creating and critiquing into pedagogical practice” (Davidson).

• From You Can Teach Writing: “When writing a literary analysis: Use thesis + support (persuasive pattern)” by Linda Aragoni

• From Stuff.co.nz: “E-book limit upsets apple cart for local iPad users” by Claire McEntee

• Just a quick reminder that the (technological) world apparently revolves around the United States, as illustrated by Australian and New Zealanders’ frustration over time lags for e-books.

• From StatesmanJournal.com: “Video: What eReader is right for you?” by Barbara Curtin

• From Doyce Testerman: “The Life of a Furtive Writer” by Doyce

• From The New York Observer (Media Mob): "Jane Pratt Teams Up With Teen Blogger For New Magazine” by Hunter Walker

• From The Spy Report (News from Media Spy): “US: Amazon to increase Kindle royalties to publishers” by bacco|007

• From Miami Herald: “In digital world, Miami’s book fair still bedazzles” by Connie Ogle

• From PCMAG.com: “Our Favorite Blogs: 2010” by Eric Griffith

• Sweet Valley Confidential (Book Excerpt – Chapter One) by Francine Pascal

• From copyblogger: “How to Put Yourself into an Effortless Writing Zone” by James Chartrand

• From Whatever: “The Man in the Frey Flannel Suit” by John Scalzi

• From New York Magazine (Books): “James Frey’s Fiction Factory: The controversial author is hiring young writers to join him in a new publishing company.  The goal is to produce the next Twilight.  The contracts are brutal.” By Suzanne Mozes

• From hindustantimes: “Is your child a hypernetworker?” by Sanchita Sharma

• From HASTAC: “Digital Humanities Sessions at the 2011 MLA” by Mark Sample

• I might have had to wipe the drool from my keyboard after reading through the panel descriptions.  And in the words of Liz Lemon, “I want to go to there.”

The following articles came from friends, Facebook, and my own web browsing.  These too are posted in no particular order.

• From MatadorNetwork: “20 Obsolete English Words that Should Make a Comeback” by Heather Carreiro (Thanks Jessica for the link!)

• From The Huffington Post: “An Appeal From Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales” by Jimmy Wales

• From Guardian.co.uk: “What’s on the next page in the great ebook race?” by Justin McGuirk

• From The New York Times: “Great Holiday Expectations for E-Readers” by Julie Bosman

• From Lost Angeles Times: “Libraries reinvent themselves as they struggle to remain relevant in the digital age: They’re preparing for a future in which materials can be checked out and read from a home computer, smart phones or e-reader.” By David Sarno

• From lifehacker: “Top 10 Tips for Better Writing” by Whitson Gordon

• From BitchMedia: “Past Imperfect: The Feminine Mystique and the persistence of nostalgia” by Eryn Loeb

• From BitchMedia: “House Proud: The troubling rise of stay-at-home daughters” by Gina McGalliard

• To quote Battlestart Galactica, “All this has happened before, and it will happen again.”  That quote was running through my head as I read this article, which provoked a riot of emotions and to be honest, made me queasy.  The attitude of the fathers (and husbands) in this article immediately made me think of Cotton Mather, feme coverture, and the idealized motherhood of the republican mother from post-Revolutionary America.  This is not good, not good at all.    

• From Jezebel: “Popular Female Evangelist Claims That What God Really Wants Is For Women To Shut Up” by Morning Gloria

Don't Blink

I follow @AdviceToWriters (Jon Winokur) on Twitter, and these are a few of the links that caught my eye this past week or so. 

• “Cliches Avoid Them Like the Plague” by Laura Hayden on Suspense.net

• “A Handbook of Rhetorical Devices” by Robert A. Harris on VirtualSalt

• “11 Stupidest Writing Mistakes” on SalesHQ

• “Thirteen Writing Prompts” by Dan Wiencek on Timothy McSweeney Does Not Need An Apostrophe.

• “3 Crucial Elements of Well-Written Blog Posts” by Bamboo Forest on DailyBlogTips

Here are two other sites I want to share – one that I found the week I started my blog (blog designs), and the other I found this week while trying to find out what soft canon meant (still not quite sure and too lazy to look it up in my Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism or Dictionary of Literary Terms & Literary Theory (Penguin) books).

• “45 More Excellent Blog Designs” by Sven Lennartz on Smashing Magazine

• “Literary Vocabulary” by Dr. L. Kip Wheeler (Carson-Newman College)

Enjoy!